xsl:transform

I just noticed that the April 21 working draft of XSLT introduced
xsl:transform as an exact synonym for xsl:stylesheet. This duplication
has continued into the current proposed recommendation. Why was this
done? I can understand preferring xsl:transform to xsl:stylesheet, but
why are there two elements for exactly the same purpose?  Wouldn't it be
simpler to just pick one?

-- 
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ 
|               Java I/O (O'Reilly & Associates, 1999)               |
|            http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/books/javaio/            |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1565924851/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ | 
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list