|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: xt and jade
Both behaviours are right. In XML, <tag></tag> and <tag/> are exactly the same. I don't think you can force either of these XSL processors to behave other than they do by default (I'm not completely sure). To avoid your problem with Jade, can't you feed it the xml decl so that it accepts the <tag/> form? -----Original Message----- From: pietro abate [mailto:pietro.abate@xxxxxx] Sent: Friday, October 15, 1999 12:43 PM To: xsl Subject: xt and jade Hi, I've seen that xt and saxon have two different behavior with the empty tags. If in my xsl there is a samething like <tag></tag> saxon copies the two tags, but xt write the short form <tag/>... If I try to generate an sgml file after jade didn't want work because the sgml decl forbid the second form. which is the right behavior, and how can I force xt to work like saxon ? TIA, pietro XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








