RE: What does fo: stand for?

I believe the normally used term for "fo" is flow object.

Dave LeBlanc

At 08:15 PM 10/6/99 -0400, Didier PH Martin wrote:
>Hi Chuck,
>
>You can pick whatever you want :-) However, formatting object is better than
>flow object because a formatting object could be positioned with an absolute
>position and therefore won't be a flow object. So, formatting object seems
>better.
>
>Cheers
>Didier PH Martin
>mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.netfolder.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Chuck White
>Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 7:08 PM
>To: xsl
>Subject: What does fo: stand for?
>
>
>I know this may seem a ridiculous question, but I'm trying to do some
>documentation on FOs, and I don't see anything in the spec regarding whether
>the fo: in the namespace prefix is supposed to refer to formatting object or
>flow object. Is there a definitive answer to this somewhere in the spec that
>someone knows of and I'm just missing it?
>
>thanks.
>Chuck White
>Creative Director
>ADVANCE Recruitment Advertising, Inc.
>chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.advancerecruitment.com
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list