[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: What will be the future improvements of XSLT?

Subject: Re: What will be the future improvements of XSLT?
From: "Tangi Vass" <tangivass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:28:02 +0200
xsl for dummies
David Carlisle wrote:
> > I think also that somebody who can manage HTML with a little JavaScript,
> > even given a small subset a XSL, will surely be puzzled by such a
> > declarative language.
>
> Why should this be?
>
> I find XSL far far less puzzling than javascript. Am I really weird?
>

By XSL I meant in fact XSLT only.

I'm not defending Javascript, which is surely not a model of smart language
but I think a single argument will be enough to proove that XSLT is
puzzling: a lot of people send mail to this mailing list to ask for XSL
solutions to very simple problems (the last one is 'sorting & styling' from
Olivier Corby).
I definitely can't believe all of them have brains so twisted by years of
procedural programming they aren't able anymore to learn such a <ironic>very
simple</ironic> language.

Despite, I'm agree with you to find XLST very practical to do simple tasks
(selecting, sorting, formatting, etc.).

Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>A summary of XSL for Dummies takes 2 slides in a presentation,
>followed by (say) 6 more slides of examples.

I'm also agree with him but, as Michael Kay said, XSL is far too rich in
concepts for people accustomed to "HTML with CSS stylesheets and a little
JavaScript". The step in front of those who will want to stop being dummies
and do tricky things will be vertiginously abrupt.

It's indeed a pity that trying to do slightly more complicated things (just
try for instance to apply a template on any different value of an item that
can have sibblings with the same value) turns into a nightmare.

In fact, it's vain to debate about whichever language is the most puzzling:
- Non-programmers need to be able to do simple things easily so current
templates and non-mutable variables are nice ;
- Programmers will have more complicated needs so imposing pure declarative
style is sadistic !

That's all for this debate, as far as I'm concerned. The intention behind my
first posting wasn't to trigger a 'mine is the best' kind of argue.
By the way, I wish to thank Michael Kay, James Clark, and Oren Ben-Kiki for
their quick answers.

Tangi Vass


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.