RE: release of FOP
Hi James This is a good idea, we can start with FOP, follow the evolution of the specs then port it to C++. Sound like a reasonable scenario. regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of James Tauber Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 8:51 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: release of FOP > to include FOP into Mozilla, we need the following steps: > > a) make a C/C++ version and package it as a XPCOM module I would suggest that it is too early to do that. XSL is still too much of a moving target and not enough of it has been implemented in FOP anyway yet. I would suggest effort would be better spent helping to get FOP to support more of the current XSL draft and *then* think about porting it. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format