Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring())
Steve Tinney wrote: > > It is laudable that the XSL designers are aiming to be all-inclusive. > However, not providing substring() or the like will make some common > publishing things difficult, unless people can suggest good workarounds. We haven't said that XSL will never provide substring or the like. It's just that there's more than one way to do it and diffferent groups have to reach agreement on which the right way is. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format