Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring())

Steve Tinney wrote:
> 
> It is laudable that the XSL designers are aiming to be all-inclusive.
> However, not providing substring() or the like will make some common
> publishing things difficult, unless people can suggest good workarounds.

We haven't said that XSL will never provide substring or the like.  It's
just that there's more than one way to do it and diffferent groups have
to reach agreement on which the right way is.

James



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list