Subject: Re: XSLT vs JSP
From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:14:12 -0400 (EDT)
|
[Sebastian Rahtz]
> Chuck Robey writes:
> > Troff (or groff, actually) is still being used to write books.
> > That's too bad,
>
> why is that bad? what is wrong with using a high-quality, flexible,
> stable tool for the job?
Because doing anything but printing with it is a nightmare. For the
forthcoming _Perl CD Bookshelf_ we had _Programming Perl_ in SGML; it
went on-line easily. We had four books in Frame, relatively well-
tagged; we saved them as XML and then processed them into DocBook with
Perl. Pretty easy. _Perl in a Nutshell_ was in troff, and took more
time to convert for on-line use than the other books put together.
Yuck.
-Chris
--
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|