Re: XSL performance problem
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Scott_Boag/CAM/Lotus wrote: > I think it's a bit unfair to be judging XSL performance at this time. Both > XT and LotusXSL are documented to be not optimized yet. There are a LOT of > things to be done for optimization, and I know both James and myself (and > other processors like XSL:P) have these optimizations in our plans. I > think you'll be pleased at how fast XSL can become. But right now > stability and draft supporting features come first. > > Remember how early in the game it is -- XSL is not yet a recommended > standard, and the last draft brought radical change to the expression > syntax. > > -scott > Can you share with us what optimization is expected in the future release of xsl processor? Some members of the list mention tenfold improvement. I think 3x(of December draft's xt - I haven't timed the new xt.) improvement is hardly possible as I thinks xt is at least partially-optimized. I've also made an xsl processor and tried to optimize it a lot. It still does not go near xt. I've also found that the JVM ,suiting for (some) xsl processors, is microsoft jview. The new hotspot is very disappointing. Nantapon. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format