> How does Python's X*L-processing performance compare with Java's? (I
> realize you've got a vested interest in reporting that it compares
> favorably. ;)  And any word on the reportedly soon-to-be-available alpha
> release of an XSL processor?

We have just released the second public Alpha of 4XSL, if this is what you 
meant.  It fixes _many_ embarrassing level problems with 4XSL 0.6.0, and now 
supports all XSL templates except for counters.  Of course, now that W3C has 
removed counters, it's moot, and boy do we have a lot of work to do to match 
this week's latest draft.

You can try out 4XSL at 

ftp:///starship.python.net/pub/crew/uche/4XSL/4XSL-0.6.1.tar.gz

We've only tested it under Solaris & Linux, though.

I hope this helps.

-- 
Uche Ogbuji
FourThought LLC, IT Consultants
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx	(970)481-0805
Software engineering, project management, Intranets and Extranets
http://FourThought.com		http://OpenTechnology.org



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list