RE: Transformation + FOs makes abuse easy
Simon St.Laurent wrote, > As a result, the 'meaningful Web' project that was the > driving force (at least in public) for the creation of > XML is at risk. Server-side transformation from > semantically rich private vocabularies to presentation- > oriented public vocabularies may leave the Web exactly > where it was before - interesting to read, but not very > useful. Silly question, but (modulo the invention of a few new mime types), wouldn't the distinction between, Accept: text/xml, text/xsl and, Accept: text/xfo resolve this issue? Ie. if you're happy to recieve a presentation-oriented server-side processed document you use the latter. If you want it undigested, you use the former. Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin Cromwell Media Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)181 410 2230 London, W6 0LJ msabin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx England XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format