Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)
From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 22:36:17 -0400
|
> That's pretty much what an XPDL file looks like, with hrefs
> pointing to all sizable chunks of information. It's not a manifest for a
particular
> document (it's referenced by the document, rather than it
> referencing the document), but that functionality wouldn't be difficult to
add for
> particular use-cases.
>
The best thing is to allow a catalog to reference a catalog (James
Clark did something like this with the DELEGATE proposal).
FWIW. I do not think that you should have *only* pull, or *only*
packages/closures. Mixed mode is also good.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Ed Nixon - Thu, 1 Apr 1999 07:31:21 -0500
|
|