Re: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)
At 09:11 AM 4/7/99 -0400, you wrote: >[snip] I view this as a sort of >layered approach, and I don't want the lower layers (XML) to have any >knowledge of the upper layers (XLL, XSL, XPDL, etc.) Perhaps then an approach to XPDL that makes sense is to view it as a kind of server-side include system. The authoring system can be quite orthogonal and layered, but the server extension for handling XPDL may transform the layered docs into packaged docs for the client, including possible capabilities negotitations. This gives the compact, self-contained document model that may be more practical now. Later more direct use of XPDL may make sense. John. ______________________________________________________ John J. Barton email: John_Barton@xxxxxxxxxx MS 3U-6 Hewlett-Packard Labs 1501 Page Mill Road phone: (650)-236-2888 Palo Alto CA 94304-1126 FAX: (650)-813-3381 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format