Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful
From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 20:00:29 -0400 (EDT)
|
On Sat, 17 Apr 1999, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
> 1 there must be a specification for aural formatting objects
> 2 there must be implementations of aural formatting objects
> 3 the fact that the user has an aural client must be known to the server
> 4 all web sites must install XTL sheets to transform content into
> aural formatting objects
I'm with you right up to No. 4, the fantasy part :-(
I am opposed to splitting XSL into two parts because I think Microsoft
will implement one part and Netscape the other.
I do understand your motivation, and I think it's a good and
important one. I don't think we have an answer yet.
Lee
--
Liam Quin, GroveWare Inc., Toronto; The barefoot programmer
http://www.interlog.com/~liamquin/ irc.sorcery.net:Ankh
SGML/XML/Unix/C consultant, will work for socks (and money!)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|