Re: W3C-transformation language petition

Chris Maden wrote:

> Some
> argue that CSS2 already goes too far (though I don't agree, but the
> allegations alone are evidence of a problem).

I have to disagree. Some argue that because browser vendors take a lot
of time to implement what they helped to standardize in W3C WGs.
Document [1] lists a lot of user requests for CSS extensions. That
document is an evidence that CSS does not go too far and that users
are hardly waiting for more.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-CSS-potential

</Daniel>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list