Fw: XSL-T, XTL.... or XQL?

Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>Hi Oren.
>
>When you say XSL is a subset of XQL I assume you are neatly snipping away
>the XSL FOs... they aren't gone quite yet... so XSL is not a subset of XQL.


I stand corrected. XTL, then.

>But I'll play along as I know the valid point you where making :)
>
>You do however raise an interesting issue though.... do we want to lock XSL
>into the relationship you describe... being a subset of XQL?


I'd rather see it as locking XQL to be a superset of XSL, instead. I
strongly believe that this should be a requirement of any proposed XQL
language.

Have fun,

    Oren Ben-Kiki


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list