[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Venting

Subject: Re: Venting
From: "Don Park" <donpark@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 00:29:32 -0800
Re: Venting
>This seems to be rather overstating things to me.  The fact that the two
>languages are defined in one spec doesn't affect the languages
>themselves one iota.  The specifications of the two languages are
>cleanly separated: the transformation language is in section 2 and the
>formatting DTD is in section 3. Whether or not you make separate
>physical documents out of the two sections doesn't seem a big deal to
>me.


James,

I have had the misfortune of being an entrepreneur as well as a developer
for the past 18 years which means I had to worry about the color of the box
as much as what goes into it.  Based on my experience, it matters a great
deal whether one say "our product supports XSL fully" or "our product
supports half of XSL".  I will bet you my wallet that it does [note that I
did not bet the content <g>].

Best,

Don Park
Docuverse



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.