Re: Venting

[Sean McGrath]
> Maybe I've missed something and someone can provide a pointer, but I
> have not heard any noises from Microsoft about implementing FO's in
> XSL in IE. My impression from Microsoft's stuff is that they see XSL
> as a way of generating HTML - a transformation language only.

To me, this is an argument for keeping the specs together.  I don't
want a browser that doesn't implement FOs to be able to claim XSL
compliance.  (Given various browsers' track records, that probably
won't stop them.  Does anyone remember "HTML 3.0 compatible!"?)

-Chris
-- 
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list