|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Fw: Flight of fantasy...
Hi Oren.
I'm suprised the post got any response at all.
The reason why I went for attributes in the first block and optionally
content in the second was to unify syntax for not just style and document
content, but also for scripting. I think where the focus is the content of
a documents, rather than just a styling spec, seperating attributes and
content can be beneficial.
Anyhow, as the subject says it's all just fantasy... and I should quit with
the off topic posts before I get roasted :)
Cheers
Guy.
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/20/99 04:39:39 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject: Fw: Flight of fantasy...
>If we hadn't have had those sharp little brackets with SGML, but more
>traditional expression of containment, we might have wound up with...
> body {onLoad: [init]} {
> h1 {A Flight Of Fantasy}
> p {Some text...}
> }
So the first block contains attributes and the second sub elements? A pity,
I'd have thought you'd go for broke and remove the difference. As long as
we're tripping on alternate reality drugs, how about:
body {
onLoad "[init]"
h1 { "A flight of Fantasy" }
p { "Some text" }
}
I guess I'm having a severe case of weekend stress myself :-)
Have fun,
Oren Ben-Kiki
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








