Re: CSS and XSL

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> 
> At 11:30 AM 2/12/99 -0600, Paul Prescod wrote:
> It's not too late to change CSS.  One proposal for doing so and making it
> more XML-friendly was put forward in http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XSL-and-CSS,
> and certainly signaled a willingness to accomodate XML.  (No, it didn't
> include breaking up the style attribute.)  

Yes it does. 

<css:chunk display="block"
            font-weight="bold"
            margin-top="20px">

Is what I like.

<css:chunk style="display: block; font-weight: bold; margin-top:20px">

Is what I do not. My question is why the former XML-friendly convention
was not used in SVG?

> I was quite happy to see that SVG uses CSS as its style vocabulary,
> personally.

The vocabulary is fine. The syntax is not appropriate.
-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

If you spend any time administering Windows NT, you're far too familiar 
with the Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) which displays the cause of the 
crash and gives some information about the state of the system when 
it crashed.  -- "Microsoft Developer Network Magazine"


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list