I think Chris Lilley said it best: "There are very few XSL processors, and only one that I am aware of which tries to implement the whole style sheet spec rather than using parts of a style sheet spec as a non-style-sheet, which is what all the others do." Anyhow my real point for this second venting is that the fact that the formatting language is not officially specified *as a language* means that tools like FOP are in a standardization grey zone. They take in a language implicitly, not explicitly described in XSL and convert it into a rendition. Practically speaking we can infer a correct behavior for the specification, but technically speaking there is no provision for the FO output of an XSL processor being the input for any other type of software. That software has no official standing. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Remember, Ginger Rogers did everything that Fred Astaire did, but she did it backwards and in high heels." --Faith Whittlesey XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format