|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Question
Mike Dierken wrote:
>
> I feel that a 'context()' method might help in this situation. This
> 'context()' method would give you access to the DOM node that the current
> action was being evaluated against. Access to the node gives you a richer
> set of comparisons and data than variables.
I find the local constants proposal to be more familiar to me. It is like
"let" in Lisp. I think it is also more powerful than "context" because you
can store away variables from several different contexts. For example you
could collect the "foo" attribute of my ancestor "bar" and the "baz"
attribute of my ancestor "jaz" and do something with them together.
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
"Remember, Ginger Rogers did everything that Fred Astaire did,
but she did it backwards and in high heels."
--Faith Whittlesey
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








