[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why XT doesn't use the DOM

Subject: Re: Why XT doesn't use the DOM
From: "Don Park" <donpark@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 08:14:59 -0800
don t use propecia
>> As James pointed out, editability has some cost associated with it but it
is
>> a plus if scripting language is used with XSL.
>
>Editability is okay for the OUTPUT but the INPUT had better not be
>editable by inline scripts!


I disagree.  I do see some value in filtering and augmenting input by inline
scripts.  Also, I do think multiphase XSL processing will be quite common
and DOM-based XSL processor are likely to be more efficient at it.

However, I don't want to lose hair over this issue until Propecia is as
cheap as vitamin.

Cheers,

Don Park



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.