Re: xsl:comment and xsl:pi containing template elements?

> 
> BTW, thank you XSL designers for having the forethought not to bloat XSL
> with an embedded scripting solution.  My faith in XSL has been
> rekindled.  Keep up the good work.

  
I hope that either the W3C proposes a separate language that does include 
the ability to "drop out" to ECMAScript+DOM on a pattern match, OR,
that the industry has the courage not to introduce conflicting
extensions that do this, because six months to a year from now,
I doubt that will be a single widely used commercial XSL parser
that DOESN'T have a Java or Script hook in it.

I'm disappointed that this draft doesn't even mention the issue of
scripting.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list