Re: Questions on the new XSL spec (section 2.6)

David Schach wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the explanation of match ancestor.
> 
> > How about id()? Do you support something like foo/id(@ref)?
> >
> Yes when it is used in a select or test.  foo/id(@ref)  is interpreted as
> id(foo/@ref).  I don't think there is a good interpretation when it is used
> in a match.

It would match an element that's referred to by a foo element's ref
attribute.

James


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list