Keith Visco wrote:
> 
> >Couldn't you use ECMAScript on your XML after
> > XSL is done with it to do those little extras you couldn't get done in
> > XSL?
> 
> It might not be XML when you are done processing it with XSL. In which
> case...have fun parsing.

You have a fundamental misunderstanding. The tree that results from
processing an XML document with XSL is an XML node tree. You need not
"parse" it. You can attack the resulting tree DIRECTLY with the DOM. After
fiddling with it, you could save it in HTML syntax, or TeX syntax, or
whatever, but that doesn't affect the shape of the node tree.

 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

"Sports utility vehicles are gated communities on wheels" - Anon


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list