Re: XQL + XSL = Better (kinda like scripting)

Andrew Bunner wrote:
> 
>   "How hard do you want to make it for someone to write an XSL engine?"
> 
>   Your XSL engine would have to include an interpreter for a language that's
> almost as complicated as C++. 

The complexities of Ecmascript and C++ are not even on the same order.

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

The government everybody loves to abuse sues the company everybody loves
to hate. Throw in a bunch of faceless lawyers cross-examining techies
[with] all the charisma of a video driver and you've got a spectacle of
thoroughly miniscule proportions.
                - Netsurfer Digest quoted in TBTF



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list