Re: Microsoft extensions to XSL (was RE: how to call Javasc
[Didier PH Martin] > Let's experiment with it. And if that is the case, it remains now to > work on the tag stuff. i.e. script invocation. That's exactly what the XSL WG is chartered to work on: the tag stuff. If Microsoft had claimed <ms:eval> as a prioprietary extension to XSL, I may have disagreed that it were necessary, but I would not have argued that they were wrong. But they are asserting in their examples that there exists an <eval> element in the XSL namespace as defined by the XSL working draft, which is simply, unequivocally, undeniably, and inarguably FALSE. The thing they have documented IS NOT XSL. They knew that; I can only assume that they didn't care. Welcome to Microsoft. Where do you want to go today? Uh-huh... that's nice. Here's where you're going. -Chris -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format