Re: Stepping back, for a moment...

David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So, to wrap up this somewhat incoherent rambling, I think some
>> larger scale analysis of what we're really out to do may be in order
>
>which was all I really hoped to provoke with my messages, rather than
>taking a vote at this stage. Especially since the constituency of such a
>vote; namely the random collection of people signed up to this list
>is probably not representitive of anything.


So can I add another "yes" vote for question #1 (the W3 org. should address
this issue?) :-)

I agree that the constituency of the survey isn't ideal. But assuming we do
want the w3 organization to resolve this, what's the alternative?

    Oren.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list