[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent survey]

Subject: Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent survey]
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:05:35 GMT
david ben kiki
> It just seems to me we have XSL transformation syntax, which can be refined
> and developed, and on top of that we have proposed flow
> objects that may be *optionaly* used (sounds like a superset to me). I'm
> not understanding what the problem is with this arrangement.

Yes, except you're supposed to call them formatting objects these days,
lest you show your misspent dsssl youth. But of course they may only
optionally be used if they are there. Hence my argument against removing

> Please feel free to knock holes in my statements,

Sorry. All seems reasonable to me.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.