[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variations on the XML syntax

Subject: Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variations on the XML syntax
From: Chris von See <cvonsee@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 20:16:06 -0500
von see
>On Wed, 26 Aug 1998, Chris von See wrote:
>
>> If I read this correctly, the implicit assumption is that all of these
>> languages need to be capable of being hand-coded by relative newbies...
>> I've seen other comments in this list say that this is in fact a goal of
>> XML and XSL, but I tend to disagree that we should make that a *primary*
>> goal.  I believe that we should not subjugate developing powerful tools to
>> developing a syntax that "feels as if it belongs together". 
>
At 04:27 PM 8/26/98 -0400, Paul Prescod wrote:
>Why do you believe that these goals diverge? Usually, they do not. An 
>elegant design is simple enough for newbies and scales to do the powerful 
>things that experts want to do. The string-based query language seems 
>relativly simple and scalable, so we need not choose between those 
>(usually linked) design criteria.
>
I'm coming at this from a slightly different perspective...

As a software developer, if someone came to me asking for a hypermedia tool
that could do what XML/XSL can do, and I felt strongly that they would
prefer a graphical interface for working with this tool (which I do in this
case), then I would focus on making the underlying technology (i.e.
XML/XSL) as powerful as possible and put all the "simplicity" in the GUIs.

My past personal experience has been that there isn't necessarily a
divergence between simplicity and power; however, in many cases designing
things like XML/XSL to be simple enough for newbies takes up a ton of time
and effort that could be better spent on designing specialized graphical
interfaces that address the particular usage issues that come with the
various uses of XML/XSL itself.  Even in the very small time I've been on
this list, I've seen a variety of perspectives on using XML/XSL, from
"replace HTML" to the recent comments about EDI.  These audiences all have
different experiences, different thought processes, different approaches to
solving problems; to make XML/XSL as "marketable" (gasp!) as it could be,
I'd want to slant my development efforts toward products that meet their
specific needs, but are all based on a common technology.

Just two cents worth... nothing more.


Chris
True ease in writing comes from art, not chance,
As those move easiest who have learn'd to dance.

-- Pope, "Essay on Criticism, II"


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.