Re: New/old pattern syntax, why can't we have both ?
At 01:31 20/08/1998 , you wrote: | You would write a layer that will plug in the existing SAX or DOM | interface of your XML parser, expand the | short form if detected and return, again through SAX or DOM, the | expanded XML. | | This would need to be written only once and might work with any SAX/DOM | XML parser. Written once in what programming language? Would this single piece of code be useable in: DOS/Windows 3.11/Window 95/ Windows NT/all Unix flavours/mainframes/Macs/C/C++/Pascal/Ada/Java/Visual Basic/... XML is a standard document format. It is _not_ a standard set of tools, however common SAX/DOM may end up being. J ------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy http://www.steptwo.com.au/ jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Beyond the Idea" ACN 081 019 623 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format