Re: Interactive XML

At 00:15 01/07/98 +0200, Chris Lilley wrote:
>Thats an interesting use of the word portable.
>
>Even if the languages are extended to two - ECMAScript and Java 1.2, say
>- that doubles the implementation load for anyone writing a conformant
>implementation. Or alternatively, it requires softening the conformance

I use java because it is platform-independent (and can be run with or
without a browser). Is ECMAScript available in standalone form (i.e.
without a browser)? If so, I may come to learn to love it - if not, it
makes standalone XSL impossible which is a serious drawback.

	P.

Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list