Re: Interactive XML
[Martin Bryan] > Others share the concern. The XML/EDI community has made a number of > comments on the current, inadequate, XSL requirements statement, and > has repeatedly pointed out that a generalized mechanism is a > must. Unfortunately it looks like we won't get it for Version 1.0, > and will not get a date for it in this century. However, I live in > hope and eagerly await next month's draft in the hope I will be > proved wrong. The next draft won't prove you wrong; it will be a fairly simple first cut. However, there is discussion going on in the WG about interactivity, but the precise requirements haven't been agreed upon. I feel that there's a consensus that we need to do, at a minimum, as much as you can do with HTML now, and there's a pretty wide feeling that we should do more. But there isn't a ratified document stating so. -Chris, speaking only for myself and not for the WG -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format