|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Interactive XML
Paul Prescod writes:
> same standard library. Typically the ECMAScript version will be more
> readable to the typical programmer because it uses a more conventional
> syntax and less constrained ("side-effect-free") data model.
"typical", "conventional"? is the next century to remain dominated by
those who learnt their computing in the 1970s?
sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








