|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Requirements draft
> I'm curious about one point:
>
> "User Defined Functions
>
> For reuse. Parameterized, but not recursive."
>
> Does anyone know what that means? Are we talking about a function call
> mechansim *other than* the one defined in ECMAScript? and also different
> from Flow Object Macros?
>
> --
> Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
I'm interested in that too.
And how will XSL which meets these requirements relate to DSSSL?
The note from August (http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XSL.html) reads:
"... in parallel with the development of the XSL specification, a proposal
for an amendment to DSSSL will be developed so that with the amendment it
would be a superset of XSL. The amended standard would be compatible with
current DSSSL but would have three kinds of additions..."
I haven't found any statement like that in the new requirements draft. Did I
miss anything?
Bye,
Stefan.
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Stefan Mintert
UniDo: mintert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
private: stefan@xxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.informatik.uni-dortmund.de/~sm/
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"let the music keep our spirits high..."
(Jackson Browne)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








