|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: More XSL Discussion
>You've got a tool that does the report generation you need. Why does >that language have to be a "standard" for it to be useful? Of course it doesn't need to be standardized in order to be useful. However, using a standardized language makes it less of an issue if I go under a bus and someone else has to pick up my stuff and run with it. We do a lot of work with data-entry bureaus. I would love to be able to send those guys QA scripts as well as stylesheets. It would make my life a lot easier if I could just say "it is in XSL. Get yourself an XSL processor". Rather than fight with installations of perl, python or whatever. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








