[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: More XSL Discussion

Subject: Re: More XSL Discussion
From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 16:23:50 GMT
Re: More XSL Discussion
>You've got a tool that does the report generation you need. Why does
>that language have to be a "standard" for it to be useful?

Of course it doesn't need to be standardized in order to be useful.

However, using a standardized language makes it less of an
issue if I go under a bus and someone else has to pick up my
stuff and run with it.

We do a lot of work with data-entry bureaus. I would love
to be able to send those guys QA scripts as well as 
stylesheets. It would make my life a lot easier if I could
just say "it is in XSL. Get yourself an XSL processor". Rather
than fight with installations of perl, python or whatever.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.