[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

ANSWERS to "What's wrong with XQuery" question

Brett Zamir brettz9 at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 28 01:06:34 PDT 2010


  ANSWERS to "What's wrong with XQuery" question
  On 7/27/2010 10:58 PM, Martin Probst wrote:
> If you'd design a general purpose programming language, you'd probably
> make sure that common things like declaring functions or variables
> have concise syntax.

Functions don't seem so bad if you leave out the types... (though I use 
functions enough (in JavaScript) that even the word "function" is too 
long for me.

The required "else" doesn't seem so friendly to RAD though, and yes, a 
lot in the prolog seems potentially unnecessary like "declare".

Brett


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.