|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] size of XQuery developer communitybryan rasmussen rasmussen.bryan at gmail.comThu Sep 3 11:21:39 PDT 2009
The difference between R and XQuery however is that R is a language with one implementation. Thus the site for downloading R can also provide all this information to users, for XQuery it is too fragmented. Best Regards, Bryan Rasmussen On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Gary Lewis<http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk> wrote: > On Wed Aug 26 17:39:05 PDT 2009, Daniela Florescu wrote: > >> ... XQuery has tremendous potential for adding >> value to customers, but the proof isn't there yet, and the path isn't >> clear either. >> >> There has to be a larger XQuery pool of expertise ... > > Hi Daniela - I finally got around to reading this entire thread thru > to 9/1. It's truly humbling to see how much about XQuery, XML, etc I > do not know. > > But perhaps my newcomer status will provide a useful perspective. > > First some quick background. I definitely don't yet qualify as an > XQuery developer. But I've been working pretty conscientiously over > the past 4 or 5 months. I come to XQuery with decades of SQL, data > warehouse design, and policy analysis background (ie, I see databases > as a means to analysis, not an end in themselves). I got interested in > XQuery because I needed a tool that would let me query the Web in a > similar fashion to querying relational databases. The Web and web > query tools are still primitive by comparison, but I've been quite > pleased with what's possible. For example, my latest XQuery > demonstration project mashed up US Dept of Education data with Federal > Reserve data to examine the question of whether higher education in > the US is countercyclical. See: > http://garymlewis.com/instchg/2009/08/10/another-xquery-use-case-is-higher-education-countercyclical/ > > Given a choice, I'll almost always choose tools with power and > capability versus those with ease-of-use but limited application. So, > for example, I'm willing to curse and beat my head against a wall > every time I use the R stat programs because I know that somehow > there's a solution in R and that someone in the R community will know > what the solution is. > > I've probably written several thousand XQuery programs now. But I only > feel comfortable in a very narrow niche. There is just oodles about > XML and all the other X standards and tools that I do not know. Some > of this is surely just beginner's lament (ie, the notion that anything > you can't learn instantly is way too complex). But some too is a steep > learning curve in the absence of adequate support for learning. > > You ask why there is not more XQuery expertise. The XQuery community > might benefit from looking at the R community [see: > http://www.r-project.org/ ] and the considerable help resources > available there. It's easier for a developer to get untracked with any > new tool if there is visible help available. With regard to R, I'm > talking here about specialized search sites, repositories of learning > materials, open source and free tools, dozens upon dozens of forums, > examples as code fragments, online books and manuals, and a community > of very active R developers/enhancers. > > I like XQuery a lot. I will continue to use it. And no doubt in the > course of using it, I'll fill in the many holes of what I don't know. > But I could sure benefit from something like an XQuery learning > resource site. > > Gary > _______________________________________________ > http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk > http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






