|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Tuple typesFlorent Georges lists at fgeorges.orgWed Sep 2 11:44:02 PDT 2009
John Snelson wrote:
Hi,
> > This makes sense, though it would be a nuisance to have to
> > define ref() and deref() every time. Is there any
> > consideration to make them standard library functions?
> My recollection is that the WG considered adding them and
> rejected the idea on the grounds that functions that can be
> defined in XQuery itself better belong in something like EXPath
> function modules. It's highly likely that I'll submit such a
> module to EXPath in the future.
My first reaction was: "Why? Just use the HOF feature directly."
But defining ref() and deref() would actually have the double
advantage to 1/ make the intent clearer and 2/ enable one to
provide them on a processor that does not support HOFs (yet.)
Good idea.
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






