|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] size of XQuery developer communityGary Lewis gary.m.lewis at gmail.comTue Sep 1 12:40:42 PDT 2009
On Wed Aug 26 17:39:05 PDT 2009, Daniela Florescu wrote: > ... XQuery has tremendous potential for adding > value to customers, but the proof isn't there yet, and the path isn't > clear either. > > There has to be a larger XQuery pool of expertise ... Hi Daniela - I finally got around to reading this entire thread thru to 9/1. It's truly humbling to see how much about XQuery, XML, etc I do not know. But perhaps my newcomer status will provide a useful perspective. First some quick background. I definitely don't yet qualify as an XQuery developer. But I've been working pretty conscientiously over the past 4 or 5 months. I come to XQuery with decades of SQL, data warehouse design, and policy analysis background (ie, I see databases as a means to analysis, not an end in themselves). I got interested in XQuery because I needed a tool that would let me query the Web in a similar fashion to querying relational databases. The Web and web query tools are still primitive by comparison, but I've been quite pleased with what's possible. For example, my latest XQuery demonstration project mashed up US Dept of Education data with Federal Reserve data to examine the question of whether higher education in the US is countercyclical. See: http://garymlewis.com/instchg/2009/08/10/another-xquery-use-case-is-higher-education-countercyclical/ Given a choice, I'll almost always choose tools with power and capability versus those with ease-of-use but limited application. So, for example, I'm willing to curse and beat my head against a wall every time I use the R stat programs because I know that somehow there's a solution in R and that someone in the R community will know what the solution is. I've probably written several thousand XQuery programs now. But I only feel comfortable in a very narrow niche. There is just oodles about XML and all the other X standards and tools that I do not know. Some of this is surely just beginner's lament (ie, the notion that anything you can't learn instantly is way too complex). But some too is a steep learning curve in the absence of adequate support for learning. You ask why there is not more XQuery expertise. The XQuery community might benefit from looking at the R community [see: http://www.r-project.org/ ] and the considerable help resources available there. It's easier for a developer to get untracked with any new tool if there is visible help available. With regard to R, I'm talking here about specialized search sites, repositories of learning materials, open source and free tools, dozens upon dozens of forums, examples as code fragments, online books and manuals, and a community of very active R developers/enhancers. I like XQuery a lot. I will continue to use it. And no doubt in the course of using it, I'll fill in the many holes of what I don't know. But I could sure benefit from something like an XQuery learning resource site. Gary
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






