|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] size of XQuery developer communityMukul Gandhi gandhi.mukul at gmail.comFri Aug 28 23:30:54 PDT 2009
Hi Martin, I agree to many of your points. Kindly see my answers to some specific points, you have mentioned. On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Martin Probst<http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk> wrote: > exploiting this benefit leads to the schema evolution problems that > plague so many SQL users. I'm not sure whether the benefit is actually > worth the hassle of near-impossible to change schemata I very much agree to this. Where the schema is volatile, XML is a good choice, than relational model. With relational model, frequent schema changes is much harder, than with XML. > For most document centric applications XML databases would be a huge > win. I agree to this, as well. > And I'm still very sceptical about using XQuery as a > sole web development language, the approaches I've seen so far have > not been compelling at all. As I wrote earlier, people who design relational plus XML combined data models, have a good choice with hybrid SQL plus XQuery processing, for manipulating such data. Most of the large DB vendors, seem to be promoting this design. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






