|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] size of XQuery developer communityMartin Probst mail at martin-probst.comFri Aug 28 15:05:01 PDT 2009
> But I also think, that relational format is much useful even today. We > know, various reasons why relational model is beneficial (like high > security, faster processing, transactional support etc). While there is certainly a potential performance benefit in processing fixed length records (relational) compared to arbitrary trees (XML), exploiting this benefit leads to the schema evolution problems that plague so many SQL users. I'm not sure whether the benefit is actually worth the hassle of near-impossible to change schemata, there are certainly many ares (e.g. document management) where the tradeoff favors XML. Security and transaction support are not really differentiators, X-Hive/DB has had a full ACID transactional DOM implementation since 1999, including access rights and all. Other XML databases have similar features. For most document centric applications XML databases would be a huge win. What's holding them back is IMHO lack of awareness and lack of polished, complete development environments and toolsets; Documentum DDS aims at this. And I'm still very sceptical about using XQuery as a sole web development language, the approaches I've seen so far have not been compelling at all. Regards Martin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






