|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Question on expected XQuery return per standardsChristian Grün christian.gruen at gmail.comSat Mar 28 07:38:54 PST 2009
>> But it isn't. The standard is very clear that $xml//p expands to >> $xml/descendant-or-self::node()/p. The ordering is also very clear: Just to add: I observed that this rule regularly causes irritations when teaching XPath/XQuery, as many users assume that the two slashes can be dissolved to a single descendant step, which actually works fine - as long as no position predicates are involved. Christian ___________________________ Christian Gruen Universitaet Konstanz Department of Computer & Information Science D-78457 Konstanz, Germany Tel: +49 (0)7531/88-4449, Fax: +49 (0)7531/88-3577 http://www.inf.uni-konstanz.de/~gruen
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






