|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Is It Time for EXSLT 2?Adam Retter adam.retter at googlemail.comSat Jan 17 16:14:07 PST 2009
I came to a similar conclusion at the XML Prague 2007 conference after speaking with fellow eXist developers about a number of XQuery extension modules that I had added to eXist (some of which are described here - http://www.exist-db.org/extensions.html). Like Kurt my main thoughts were of avoiding vendor lock-in when developing XQuery applications and providing an open standard similar to that of the existing exslt.org. For that reason I purchased a number of domain names which I intended to use initially as a discussion for such a standard and later as a place to publish a possible standard. I hoped to collaborate with interested parties and developers of the leading XML databases in defining and establishing this standard. Unfortunately due to personal commitments in the last 18 months I have been short of free time and not much has progressed, however I now have some spare time available again. The previously mentioned exquery.org is one of the domains that I registered and I would be happy for this to be used (with the others) to publish a collaborative open standard for extensions to XQuery. So, how to get the ball rolling, who would like to be involved and the best way to collaborate on such an effort? Thanks Adam. {Subjective disclaimer - I am a developer on the eXist XML Native Database}. 2009/1/10 Florent Georges <http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk>: > Hi, > > Kurt Cagle wrote an interesting blog post about a standard library > of XQuery functions, EXQuery.org, kind of EXSLT for XQuery: > > http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/01/is-it-time-for-an-exqueryorg.html > > Some of us on XSL List thought the same thing about XSLT 2.0 for a > while, and we recently began new discussions on the EXSLT list about > a new version for XSLT 2.0. Actually, most of the extensions would > be XPath 2.0 extension functions, and I believe most of them could > be shared by XSLT 2.0 and XQuery (and maybe other plain XPath 2.0 > engines.) > > As I explain in a comment on that blog post, I think it would be > beneficial for both XSLT 2.0 and XQuery communities to join the same > effort. I would be interested to hear the XQuery community thoughts > regarding EXSLT2. > > For more info about EXSLT2, please see the EXSLT mailing list at > http://lists.fourthought.com/mailman/listinfo/exslt and the wiki at > http://www.fgeorges.org/exslt2-wiki/. > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://www.fgeorges.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk > http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- Adam Retter
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






