|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] get highest numberAndrew Welch andrew.j.welch at gmail.comSat May 17 11:34:42 PDT 2008
>> > If Gonzberg is using eXist (I remember other posts on the >> > corresponding lists), I can explain the difference: >> evaluating //@id is entirely index-based (as John already suspected). >> Compared to this, >> > max(//@id) requires access to the actual attribute nodes, which >> > generates a lot more IO. > > Thanks for the info. Obvious, when you think about it. Not to me - can someone explain this a little more for me... If //@id returns a sequence that's stored as atomics, why is max(//@id) any different to max(1 to 100000) ? The XSLT equivalent (that my mind works in is): <xsl:variable name="ids" select="//@id" as="xs:integer+"/> <xsl:sequence select="max($ids)"/> What am I missing? -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
|
Purchase Stylus Studio Online Today!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






