[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

get highest number

Andrew Welch andrew.j.welch at gmail.com
Sat May 17 11:34:42 PDT 2008


  get highest number
>> > If Gonzberg is using eXist (I remember other posts on the
>> > corresponding lists), I can explain the difference:
>> evaluating //@id is entirely index-based (as John already suspected).
>> Compared to this,
>> > max(//@id) requires access to the actual attribute nodes, which
>> > generates a lot more IO.
>
> Thanks for the info. Obvious, when you think about it.

Not to me - can someone explain this a little more for me...

If //@id returns a sequence that's stored as atomics, why is
max(//@id) any different to max(1 to 100000) ?

The XSLT equivalent (that my mind works in is):

<xsl:variable name="ids" select="//@id" as="xs:integer+"/>

<xsl:sequence select="max($ids)"/>

What am I missing?

-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/


Purchase Stylus Studio Online Today!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.