|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] get highest numberDavid Carlisle davidc at nag.co.ukWed May 14 15:13:08 PDT 2008
> Or switch to a better XQuery processor. I find it hard to imagine why a > product should take noticeably longer to evaluate max(//@id) than it takes > to evaluate //@id. if the input is typed then it's possible that max(//@id) could be doing locale-sensitive lexicographic comparison, which it would slow it down (a bit), in which case doing max(//number(@id)) might help. But on the other hand if the id values are numeric they didn't ought to be typed with a (subtype of) xsd:string rather than a numeric type, so this is just a blind and probably wrong guess... David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
|
Purchase Stylus Studio Online Today!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






