|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Future of XQuery and XQuery Update FacliltyTimothy Marc timothymarc at freenet.deMon Oct 22 22:51:42 PDT 2007
Hi all again, as initiator of that discussion, I'd like to add my opinion: The arguments for the update extension of XQuery had already been listed. I think, a query language should include a mechanism for proceeding updates just like plain queries. I can't believe, that sql would have had become that popular, if manipulating data were just "extension". I would appreciate, if XQUF would be integrated into the XQuery standard. After testing XQUF intensive, i think, this is a great enhancement of the xquery 1.0 specification. You see, comercial and non-comercial database vendors (Tamino, eXist, DB2) had developed proprietary <http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=eL4jZr&search=proprietary> update mechanism, XML:DB XUpdate for example. So i think, it is time to <http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=eL4jZr&search=to> satisfy <http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=eL4jZr&search=satisfy> the <http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=eL4jZr&search=the> needs <http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=eL4jZr&search=needs> of <http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=eL4jZr&search=of> a xml-update-language like XQUF. Bye mfw
|
Purchase Stylus Studio Online Today!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






