|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Future of XQuery and XQuery Update FacliltyMichael Kay mike at saxonica.comMon Oct 22 21:36:51 PDT 2007
> > I don't follow you. I don't see that at all. > Well, the language semantics are expressed in terms of pending update lists, and you want to expose those pending update lists to the user. But an implementation only has to behave "as if" there were a pending update list. Internally, it might do the update immediately, detect conflicts as they arise, and roll back to the original state if there is a failure. You're making it quite difficult to implement it that way if the PUL is visible to user applications. In the case of XQuery implementations built on top of an RDBMS, I would think they are likely to use the transaction manager of the database service. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
|
Purchase Stylus Studio Online Today!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






