|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The State of Native XML databasesMichael Rys mrys at microsoft.comTue Aug 21 11:33:43 PDT 2007
None of DB2, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server require an XML Schema. They have the option to associate a schema or a collection of schemas which then enforces validity. Best regards Michael -----Original Message----- From: http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk [mailto:http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk] On Behalf Of John Snelson Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:26 AM To: Elliotte Harold Cc: Ilya Sterin; http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk; Dr Orlovsky MA Subject: Re: Re: The State of Native XML databases Elliotte Harold wrote: > Ilya Sterin wrote: > >> I don't necessarily debate the schema itself, but there must be a DDL >> to represent the schema, right? > > There doesn't have to be a schema at all, nor do the documents you put > into a database necessarily have to conmform to a schema if there is > one. (One big difference between SQL and XML). > > Do any of the XML databases out there actually require that users > provide a schema and then automatically reject all documents that do not > conform to that schema? It's my understanding that XML support in a number of the big relational databases requires an XML Schema, and cannot store documents that do not conform to the schema. John _______________________________________________ http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
|
Purchase Stylus Studio Online Today!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






