|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The State of Native XML databasesRonald Bourret rpbourret at rpbourret.comTue Aug 21 07:48:02 PDT 2007
Fair enough, but there are probably use cases in the integration world where this is not possible or very, very difficult, especially if you don't have control over the sources you are integrating. For example, you might have Name elements in different parts of the document with different structures -- in one place, a Name might simply contain a person's name as a string; in another place, a Name might contain child elements describing the different parts of the name (Given, Family, etc.) -- Ron John Snelson wrote: > I think a strong argument could be made that a criteria for being a well > designed XML document is the ability to tell an element's type from it's > name - or at least from the path to it. This is why I said XML /could > be/ self describing. > > Of course, there are plenty of badly designed XML formats out there.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






